EMJ

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soh, C R
Right arrow Articles by Goh, M H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soh, C R
Right arrow Articles by Goh, M H
Emerg Med J 2002; 19:292-294
© 2002 the Emergency Medicine Journal


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Tracheal intubation by novice staff: the direct vision laryngoscope or the lighted stylet (Trachlight)?

C R Soh, C F Kong, C S Kong, P C Ip-Yam, E Chin, M H Goh

Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr C R Soh, Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Singapore General Hospital Pte Ltd, Outram Road, Singapore 169608;
rojak{at}bigfoot.com

Objective: To compare the ease of use of the direct vision laryngoscope and the lighted stylet (Trachlight) by novice staff.

Methods: Ten novice medical officers (MOs) performed orotracheal intubations using either the conventional direct vision laryngoscope (DL) or a lighted stylet device (Trachlight). They performed their DL intubations during the first phase of the study, followed by the Trachlight intubations in the subsequent phase.

Results: 51 of 54 (94%) of the DL intubation attempts were successful compared with 36 of 54 (67%) of the Trachlight intubations (p<0.001). The mean (SEM) time for intubation was 44 (7) seconds in the DL group and 66 (13) seconds in the Trachlight group (p=0.004). In addition 45 of 54 (83%) of the DL intubations were successful at the first attempt versus 15 of 54 (28%) in the Trachlight group (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The results show that the use of the conventional direct vision laryngoscope in novices is associated with significantly shorter mean intubation times and higher success rates on the first attempt compared with the Trachlight.


Keywords: orotracheal intubation; light wand; Trachlight

Abbreviations: DL, direct vision laryngoscope; MO, medical officer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K.-I Cheng, K.-S. Chu, S.-W. Chau, S.-L. Ying, H.-T. Hsu, Y.-L. Chang, and C.-S. Tang
Lightwand-Assisted Intubation of Patients in the Lateral Decubitus Position
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 279 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Intubation by Novices Better with Direct Vision Laryngoscope Than with Trachlight
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, September 11, 2002; 2002(911): 7 - 7.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
© 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine