HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kilroy, D A Articles by Morris, F Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kilroy, D A Articles by Morris, F

Emergency department investigation of deep vein thrombosis

Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D A Kilroy, Department of Emergency Medicine, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK;
dakilroy{at}doctors.org.uk

Objectives: To apply a previously validated clinical model for predicting pre-test probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) to patients attending an emergency department with symptoms suggestive of DVT and assess its reproducibility in the patient population. To measure the diagnostic value of the SimpliRED D-dimer assay in effectively excluding DVT.

Method: Prospective study between March 1999 and October 2000 of adult patients attending with suspected DVT. Patients were assessed using Wells' clinical prediction tool and risk stratified. SimpliRED D-dimer estimations were then performed and compression ultrasonography arranged. The pre-test probabilities of DVT in the low, moderate, and high risk groups of Wells' original cohort were compared with the authors' figures and the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the SimpliRED assay calculated for the patient population.

Results: Application of Wells' criteria to patients in the department permitted stratification into high, moderate, and low risk groups (prevalence of DVT 58.3%, 8.9%, and 1.5% respectively). SimpliRED D-dimer assay sensitivity was 63.4% with specificity of 74.8%, with a likelihood ratio of 2.52 for a positive test and 0.49 for a negative test.

Conclusions: Clinical risk stratification allowed patients to be categorised into high, moderate, and low risk groups, albeit with less discriminatory power than originally described by Wells. The low sensitivity of the SimpliRED D-dimer assay when used routinely in a busy emergency department raises substantial doubt over the use of this test to rule out DVT, even in low risk patients.

Keywords: deep vein thrombosis; D-dimer estimation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V A Cooke and A K Fletcher Deep vein thrombosis among injecting drug users in Sheffield. Emerg. Med. J., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 777 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Goodacre, M. Stevenson, A. Wailoo, F. Sampson, A.J. Sutton, and S. Thomas How should we diagnose suspected deep-vein thrombosis? QJM, June 1, 2006; 99(6): 377 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Goodacre, A. J. Sutton, and F. C. Sampson Meta-Analysis: The Value of Clinical Assessment in the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis Ann Intern Med, July 19, 2005; 143(2): 129 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Goodacre, F.C. Sampson, A.J. Sutton, S. Mason, and F. Morris Variation in the diagnostic performance of D-dimer for suspected deep vein thrombosis QJM, July 1, 2005; 98(7): 513 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Wakai Emergency department investigation of deep vein thrombosis Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2004; 21(5): 648 - 648. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Sinharay and F Pressley Cost effective approach for emergency department investigation of deep vein thrombosis Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 126 - 126. [Full Text] [PDF]