EMJ

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miró, OÒ
Right arrow Articles by Wardrope, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miró, OÒ
Right arrow Articles by Wardrope, J
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Emerg Med J 2003; 20:143-148
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group, British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine, & Faculty of Accident & Emergency Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Analysis of patient flow in the emergency department and the effect of an extensive reorganisation

Ò Miró, M Sánchez, G Espinosa, B Coll-Vinent, E Bragulat, J Millá

Emergency Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Ò Miró, Emergency Department, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain;
omiro{at}clinic.ub.es

Objectives: To evaluate the different internal factors influencing patient flow, effectiveness, and overcrowding in the emergency department (ED), as well as the effects of ED reorganisation on these indicators.

Methods: The study compared measurements at regular intervals of three hours of patient arrivals and patient flow between two comparable periods (from 10 February to 2 March) of 1999 and 2000. In between, a structural and staff reorganisation of ED was undertaken. The main reason for each patient remaining in ED was recorded and allocated to one of four groups: (1) factors related to ED itself ; (2) factors related to ED-hospital interrelation; (3) factors related to hospital itself; and (4) factors related to neither ED nor hospital. The study measured the number of patients waiting to be seen and the waiting time to be seen as effectiveness markers, as well as the percentage of time that ED was overcrowded, as judged by numerical and functional criteria.

Results: Effectiveness of ED was closely related with some ED related and hospital related factors. After the reorganisation, patients who remained in ED because of hospital related or non-ED-non-hospital related factors decreased. ED reorganisation reduced the number of patients waiting to be seen from 5.8 to 2.5 (p<0.001) and waiting time from 87 to 24 minutes (p<0.001). Before the reorganisation, 31% and 48% of the time was considered to be overcrowded in numerical and functional terms respectively. After the reorganisation, these figures were reduced to 8% and 15% respectively (p<0.001 for both).

Conclusions: ED effectiveness and overcrowding are not only determined by external pressure, but also by internal factors. Measurement of patient flow across ED has proved useful in detecting these factors and in being used to plan an ED reorganisation.


Keywords: patient flow; reorganisation

Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; NPW, number of patients waiting; WT, wating time


 

MEDICAL EMERGENCY SERVICES AND PATIENT FLOWS

J Wardrope

Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Nothern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr J Wardrope;
jim.wardrope{at}northngh-tr.trent.nhs.uk


Relevant Article

Primary Survey
Pete Driscoll and Jim Wardrope
Emerg. Med. J. 2003 20: 111. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S Nunez, A Hexdall, and A Aguirre-Jaime
Unscheduled returns to the emergency department: an outcome of medical errors?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 102 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
J Wardrope and P Driscoll
Health care policy makers, we have a problem
Emerg. Med. J., September 1, 2003; 20(5): 399 - 399.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
J Wardrope and P Driscoll
Turbulent times
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2003; 20(2): 116 - 116.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
OÒ Miro, M Sanchez, G Espinosa, B Coll-Vinent, E Bragulat, J Milla, and J Wardrope
Analysis of patient flow in the emergency department and the effect of an extensive reorganisation
Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2003; 20(2): 143 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine