EMJ

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Web-only Appendix
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, D W G
Right arrow Articles by Crean, S. V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, D W G
Right arrow Articles by Crean, S. V
Emerg Med J 2004; 21:194-196
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine, & Faculty of Accident & Emergency Medicine


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Topical adrenaline and cocaine gel for anaesthetising children’s lacerations. An audit of acceptability and safety

D W G Kennedy1, Z Shaikh1, M J Fardy1, R J Evans2, StJ V Crean1

1 Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Heath, Cardiff, UK
2 Emergency Unit, University Hospital of Wales

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr D W G Kennedy
Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Heath, Cardiff CF64 1SP, UK; dwgkennedy{at}aol.com

Objectives: (1) To assess the acceptability of a gel solution of adrenaline (epinephrine) (1 in 2000) and cocaine (5%) for anaesthetising children’s facial lacerations to the child, parent, and operator. (2) To assess the safety of the current protocol.

Setting: The emergency unit of a large university hospital.

Methods: All patients who were treated with topical adrenaline and cocaine (topAC) gel over a six month period were entered into a prospective audit (n = 75). Patient details, the nature and cause of the injury, and any treatment carried out were all recorded. The acceptability to children over 3 years of age, was assessed by the use of the Wong Baker face scale, in which 0 represents "no hurt" and 5 represents "hurts worst". The acceptability to both the parent and the operator was assessed by the use of a 0 to 9 Likert scale, where 0 represented "very acceptable" and 9 represented "not at all" acceptable.

Results: (1) Children aged 3 years or older graded their pain during the procedure as having a mean value of 1.17 on the Wong Baker (0 to 5) scale. Parents graded acceptability on the Likert scale (0 to 9) with a mean score of 1.13. Operators using the same grading system, recorded a mean score of 1.75. (2) No toxic side effects were seen but the protocol was updated in line with evidence.

Conclusions: Topical adrenaline and cocaine is an effective anaesthetic for suturing children’s facial lacerations and is acceptable to child, parent, and operator alike.


Keywords: adrenaline; cocaine; children; topical anaesthetic gel; epinephrine




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Topical Anaesthesia in Children – an alternative to cocaine
Bimal M Mehta, et al.
EMJ Online, 29 Jun 2004 [Full text]
Topical anaesthesia in children
Matt Baker
EMJ Online, 14 Jul 2004 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, and British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine